bar
This journal article, published in a 2015 volume of Pediatrics, focuses on the need to increase behavioral screening and offers potential changes in practice and the health system, as well as the research needed to accomplish this. Read More
Learn how and why Pennsylvania’s Department of Public Welfare (DPW) adopted the ASQ-3 and the ASQ:SE as the program’s screening tools of choice after the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania established a statewide developmental and social-emotional screening program. Read More
This study, published in a 2011 volume of Pediatrics, compares pediatricians’ use of standardized screening tools from 2002 to 2009. Read More
To confirm the utility and efficacy of SEAM, intensive research has been performed. Read more about the research behind SEAM in this technical appendix. Read More
In 2013, Infants & Young Children published this article that examined whether results differed when ASQ screenings were completed on paper or online. The study found that the results can be considered equivalent. Read More
This study, published in Infants & Young Children in 2012, reviews 14 commonly used tools that identify young children with developmental delays, including ASQ. Read More
In 2012, Pediatrics in Review published this article, which explains how and why using standardized screening tools in pediatric practices is crucial to child development. Read More
This study, published by Pediatrics in 2007, investigated the effectiveness and costs of incorporating ASQ developmental screening, into the 12- and 24-month well-child visits under “real world” conditions. Read More
This journal article, which was published in a 2014 issue of the Journal of Pediatric Health Care, shows agreement between scores on the ASQ-3, the M-CHAT, and SCQ. Read More
This poster evaluates the technical adequacy of the SEAM for Infants and Toddlers. This poster was originally presented by Jane Squires and Jantina Clifford at Zero to Three’s National Training Institute in 2014. Read More