| “Compensating for missed opportunities, such as the failure to detect early difficulties…often requires extensive intervention, if not heroic efforts, later in life.” —From Neurons to Neighborhoods[1] |
Screening young children is an effective, efficient way for professionals to catch problems and start treatment when it does the most good—during the crucial early years when the child’s brain and body are developing so rapidly.
Because developmental and social-emotional delays can be subtle and can occur in children who appear to be developing typically, most children who would benefit from early intervention are not identified until after they start school. Even pediatricians, the child health specialists, fail to detect delays more than 70% of the time when they rely on clinical judgment alone.[2] (See how your state compares with the percent of children receiving a standardized screening for developmental or behavioral problems from age 10 months-5 years.)
Research underscores the importance of early intervention:
- Developmental delays, learning disorders, and behavioral and social-emotional problems are estimated to affect 1 in every 6 children.[3]
- Only 20% to 30% of these children are identified as needing help before school begins.[4]
- Intervention prior to kindergarten has huge academic, social, and economic benefits. Studies have shown that children who receive early treatment for developmental delays are more likely to graduate from high school, hold jobs, live independently, and avoid teen pregnancy, delinquency, and violent crime, which results in a savings to society of about $30,000 to $100,000 per child.[5]
- If social-emotional problems are identified and addressed early, children are less likely to be placed in special education programs—and later in life, they’re also less likely to experience school failure and unemployment.
Given the overwhelming benefits of early identification and early intervention, more and more groups are calling for routine screening:
- The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires states to identify, locate, and evaluate all children with disabilities who are in need of early intervention or special education services.
- The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that all infants and young children be screened for delays as a regular part of their ongoing health care.[6]
- The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the Child Neurology Society (CNS) call for screening at all well-child visits from infancy through school-age and “at any age thereafter if concerns are raised about social acceptance, learning, or behavior.”[7]
- Medicaid’s Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit requires screening at each well-child visit.
Studies show that when professionals use reliable and valid screening instruments, they are able to identify 70% to 80% of children with developmental delays.[8]
ASQ is reliable and valid—see how it accurately screens kids for delays >>
Sources
[1] National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. (2000, November). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington: National Academies Press.
[2] Glascoe, F. P. (2000). Early detection of developmental and behavioral problems. Pediatrics in Review, 21(8), 272–280.
[3] Dunkle, M. (Fall 2004). High Quality Developmental Screening. Developmental & Behavioral News, 13(2). Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://www.dbpeds.org/articles/detail.cfm?id=373
[4] Component Seven: Surveillance and Screening Facilitator Manual, Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs. Retrieved January 2, 2006, http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/training/materials/April2004Curriculum/SS/Screening Facilitator.pdf
[5] Glascoe, F. P., Shapiro, H. L. (2004, May 27). Introduction to Developmental and Behavioral Screening. developmental behavioral pediatrics online. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://www.dbpeds.org/articles/detail.cfm?id=5
[6] American Academy of Pediatrics (2001, July). Developmental Surveillance and Screening of Infants and Young Children, Pediatrics, 108(1), 192–196.
[7] American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society, (2000, August). Practice parameter: Screening and diagnosis of autism, Neurology, 468–479.
[8] Squires, J. Nickel, R. E., Eisert, D. (1996). Early detection of developmental problems: Strategies for monitoring young children in the practice setting. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 17, 420–427.
